p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Vulnerabilidades recientes

Vulnerabilidades de wolfssl · Página 5

Vulnerabilidad publicada para wolfssl en los últimos 30 días: 1. En el catálogo KEV: 0.

Filtrar vulnerabilidades
Borrar filtros

Vulnerabilidades: 149

  1. CVE-2025-11931

    Baja · CVSS 2.1EPSS 0,34%Sin corrección publicada

    Integer Underflow Leads to Out-of-Bounds Access in XChaCha20-Poly1305 Decrypt

    Integer Underflow Leads to Out-of-Bounds Access in XChaCha20-Poly1305 Decrypt. This issue is hit specifically with a call to the function wc_XChaCha20Poly1305_Decrypt() which is not used with TLS connections, only from direct calls from an application.

    Publicación Actualización
  2. CVE-2025-12888

    Baja · CVSS 1EPSS 0,31%Sin corrección publicada

    Constant Time Issue with Xtensa-based ESP32 and X22519

    Vulnerability in X25519 constant-time cryptographic implementations due to timing side channels introduced by compiler optimizations and CPU architecture limitations, specifically with the Xtensa-based ESP32 chips. If targeting Xtensa it is recommended to use the low memory implementations of X25519, which is now turned on as the default for Xtensa.

    Publicación Actualización
  3. CVE-2025-11936

    Media · CVSS 6.3EPSS 0,46%Sin corrección publicada

    Potential DoS Vulnerability through Multiple KeyShareEntry with Same Group in TLS 1.3 ClientHello

    Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 KeyShareEntry parsing in wolfSSL v5.8.2 on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial-of-service by sending a crafted ClientHello message containing duplicate KeyShareEntry values for the same supported group, leading to excessive CPU and memory consumption during ClientHello processing.

    Publicación Actualización
  4. CVE-2025-11933

    Baja · CVSS 2.3EPSS 0,45%Sin corrección publicada

    DoS Vulnerability in wolfSSL TLS 1.3 CKS Extension

    Improper Input Validation in the TLS 1.3 CKS extension parsing in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to potentially cause a denial-of-service via a crafted ClientHello message with duplicate CKS extensions.

    Publicación Actualización
  5. CVE-2025-11934

    Baja · CVSS 2.1EPSS 0,17%Sin corrección publicada

    Improper Validation of Signature Algorithm Used in TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify

    Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows for downgrading the signature algorithm used. For example when a client sends ECDSA P521 as the supported signature algorithm the server previously could respond as ECDSA P256 being the accepted signature algorithm and the connection would continue with using ECDSA P256, if the client supports ECDSA P256.

    Publicación Actualización
  6. CVE-2025-11935

    Media · CVSS 6.3EPSS 0,23%Sin corrección publicada

    Forward Secrecy Violation in WolfSSL TLS 1.3

    With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a server responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke without a key_share extension. The re-use of an authenticated PSK connection that on the clients side unexpectedly did not have PFS, reduces the security of the connection.

    Publicación Actualización
  7. CVE-2025-7394

    Alta · CVSS 7EPSS 0,46%Corrección disponible

    CVE-2025-7394

    In the OpenSSL compatibility layer implementation, the function RAND_poll() was not behaving as expected and leading to the potential for predictable values returned from RAND_bytes() after fork() is called. This can lead to weak or predictable random numbers generated in applications that are both using RAND_bytes() and doing fork() operations. This only affects applications explicitly calling RAND_bytes() after fork() and does not affect any internal TLS operations. Although RAND_bytes() documentation in OpenSSL calls out not being safe for use with fork() without first calling RAND_poll(), an additional code change was also made in wolfSSL

    • Actualiza a 5.5.4-2+deb12u2
    Publicación Actualización
  8. CVE-2024-2881

    Media · CVSS 6.7EPSS 0,46%Sin corrección publicada

    Fault Injection of EdDSA signature in WolfCrypt

    Fault Injection vulnerability in wc_ed25519_sign_msg function in wolfssl/wolfcrypt/src/ed25519.c in WolfSSL wolfssl5.6.6 on Linux/Windows allows remote attacker co-resides in the same system with a victim process to disclose information and escalate privileges via Rowhammer fault injection to the ed25519_key structure.

    Publicación Actualización
  9. CVE-2024-1545

    Media · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,58%Sin corrección publicada

    Fault Injection of RSA encryption in WolfCrypt

    Fault Injection vulnerability in RsaPrivateDecryption function in wolfssl/wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in WolfSSL wolfssl5.6.6 on Linux/Windows allows remote attacker co-resides in the same system with a victim process to disclose information and escalate privileges via Rowhammer fault injection to the RsaKey structure.

    Publicación Actualización
  10. CVE-2024-1543

    Media · CVSS 4.1EPSS 0,18%Sin corrección publicada

    AES T-Table sub-cache-line leakage

    The side-channel protected T-Table implementation in wolfSSL up to version 5.6.5 protects against a side-channel attacker with cache-line resolution. In a controlled environment such as Intel SGX, an attacker can gain a per instruction sub-cache-line resolution allowing them to break the cache-line-level protection. For details on the attack refer to: https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500

    Publicación Actualización
  11. CVE-2024-1544

    Media · CVSS 4.1EPSS 0,35%Sin corrección publicada

    ECDSA nonce bias caused by truncation

    Generating the ECDSA nonce k samples a random number r and then truncates this randomness with a modular reduction mod n where n is the order of the elliptic curve. Meaning k = r mod n. The division used during the reduction estimates a factor q_e by dividing the upper two digits (a digit having e.g. a size of 8 byte) of r by the upper digit of n and then decrements q_e in a loop until it has the correct size. Observing the number of times q_e is decremented through a control-flow revealing side-channel reveals a bias in the most significant bits of k. Depending on the curve this is either a negligible bias or a significant bias larg

    Publicación Actualización
  12. CVE-2024-5814

    Media · CVSS 5.1EPSS 0,47%Sin corrección publicada

    Unverifed Ciphersuite used on a client-side TLS1.3 Downgrade

    A malicious TLS1.2 server can force a TLS1.3 client with downgrade capability to use a ciphersuite that it did not agree to and achieve a successful connection. This is because, aside from the extensions, the client was skipping fully parsing the server hello. https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500

    Publicación Actualización
  13. CVE-2024-5288

    Media · CVSS 5.1EPSS 0,42%Sin corrección publicada

    Safe-error attack on TLS 1.3 Protocol

    An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.7.0. A safe-error attack via Rowhammer, namely FAULT+PROBE, leads to ECDSA key disclosure. When WOLFSSL_CHECK_SIG_FAULTS is used in signing operations with private ECC keys, such as in server-side TLS connections, the connection is halted if any fault occurs. The success rate in a certain amount of connection requests can be processed via an advanced technique for ECDSA key recovery.

    Publicación Actualización
  14. CVE-2024-5991

    Crítica · CVSS 10EPSS 0,56%Sin corrección publicada

    Buffer overread in domain name matching

    In function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. If a caller was attempting to do a name check on a non-NULL terminated buffer, the code would read beyond the bounds of the input array until it found a NULL terminator.This issue affects wolfSSL: through 5.7.0.

    Publicación Actualización
  15. CVE-2023-6936

    Media · CVSS 5.3EPSS 0,6%Sin corrección publicada

    Heap-buffer over-read with WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS

    In wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6, if callback functions are enabled (via the WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS flag), then a malicious TLS client or network attacker can trigger a buffer over-read on the heap of 5 bytes (WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS is only intended for debugging).

    Publicación Actualización
  16. CVE-2023-6937

    Media · CVSS 5.3EPSS 0,51%Sin corrección publicada

    Improper (D)TLS key boundary enforcement

    wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one (D)TLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine (D)TLS messages using different keys into one (D)TLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in (D)TLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted (D)TLS 1.3 record from the server containing first a ServerHello message and then the rest of the first server flight would be accepted by a wolfSSL client. In (D)TLS 1.3 the handshake is encrypted after the ServerHello but a wolfSSL client would accept an unencrypted flight from the server. This does not compromise key negotiation and authentication so it is

    Publicación Actualización
  17. CVE-2023-6935

    Media · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,54%Sin corrección publicada

    Marvin Attack vulnerability in SP Math All RSA

    wolfSSL SP Math All RSA implementation is vulnerable to the Marvin Attack, new variation of a timing Bleichenbacher style attack, when built with the following options to configure: --enable-all CFLAGS="-DWOLFSSL_STATIC_RSA" The define “WOLFSSL_STATIC_RSA” enables static RSA cipher suites, which is not recommended, and has been disabled by default since wolfSSL 3.6.6.  Therefore the default build since 3.6.6, even with "--enable-all", is not vulnerable to the Marvin Attack. The vulnerability is specific to static RSA cipher suites, and expected to be padding-independent. The vulnerability allows an attacker to decrypt ciphertexts and forge

    Publicación Actualización

Comprueba tu servidor

Compara tu pila y las versiones instaladas con las bases actuales de vulnerabilidades.

Comprueba tu servidor →