p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Aktuelle Sicherheitslücken

Sicherheitslücken in postgresql-17 · Seite 3

In den letzten 30 Tagen veröffentlichte Sicherheitslücken für postgresql-17: 0. Davon im KEV-Katalog: 0.

Sicherheitslücken filtern
Filter zurücksetzen

Sicherheitslücken: 52

  1. CVE-2025-12818

    Mittel · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,36%Korrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL libpq undersizes allocations, via integer wraparound

    Integer wraparound in multiple PostgreSQL libpq client library functions allows an application input provider or network peer to cause libpq to undersize an allocation and write out-of-bounds by hundreds of megabytes. This results in a segmentation fault for the application using libpq. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.1, 17.7, 16.11, 15.15, 14.20, and 13.23 are affected.

    • Auf 17.7-0+deb13u1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  2. CVE-2025-12817

    Niedrig · CVSS 3.1EPSS 0,24%Korrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL CREATE STATISTICS does not check for schema CREATE privilege

    Missing authorization in PostgreSQL CREATE STATISTICS command allows a table owner to achieve denial of service against other CREATE STATISTICS users by creating in any schema. A later CREATE STATISTICS for the same name, from a user having the CREATE privilege, would then fail. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.1, 17.7, 16.11, 15.15, 14.20, and 13.23 are affected.

    • Auf 17.7-0+deb13u1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  3. CVE-2025-8715

    Hoch · CVSS 8.8EPSS 0,43%Korrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL pg_dump newline in object name executes arbitrary code in psql client and in restore target server

    Improper neutralization of newlines in pg_dump in PostgreSQL allows a user of the origin server to inject arbitrary code for restore-time execution as the client operating system account running psql to restore the dump, via psql meta-commands inside a purpose-crafted object name. The same attacks can achieve SQL injection as a superuser of the restore target server. pg_dumpall, pg_restore, and pg_upgrade are also affected. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.6, 16.10, 15.14, 14.19, and 13.22 are affected. Versions before 11.20 are unaffected. CVE-2012-0868 had fixed this class of problem, but version 11.20 reintroduced it.

    • Auf 17.6-0+deb13u1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  4. CVE-2025-8714

    Hoch · CVSS 8.8EPSS 0,76%Korrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL pg_dump lets superuser of origin server execute arbitrary code in psql client

    Untrusted data inclusion in pg_dump in PostgreSQL allows a malicious superuser of the origin server to inject arbitrary code for restore-time execution as the client operating system account running psql to restore the dump, via psql meta-commands. pg_dumpall is also affected. pg_restore is affected when used to generate a plain-format dump. This is similar to MySQL CVE-2024-21096. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.6, 16.10, 15.14, 14.19, and 13.22 are affected.

    • Auf 17.6-0+deb13u1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  5. CVE-2025-8713

    Niedrig · CVSS 3.1EPSS 0,24%Korrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL optimizer statistics can expose sampled data within a view, partition, or child table

    PostgreSQL optimizer statistics allow a user to read sampled data within a view that the user cannot access. Separately, statistics allow a user to read sampled data that a row security policy intended to hide. PostgreSQL maintains statistics for tables by sampling data available in columns; this data is consulted during the query planning process. Prior to this release, a user could craft a leaky operator that bypassed view access control lists (ACLs) and bypassed row security policies in partitioning or table inheritance hierarchies. Reachable statistics data notably included histograms and most-common-values lists. CVE-2017-7484 and C

    • Auf 17.6-0+deb13u1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  6. CVE-2025-4207

    Mittel · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,76%Korrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL GB18030 encoding validation can read one byte past end of allocation for text that fails validation

    Buffer over-read in PostgreSQL GB18030 encoding validation allows a database input provider to achieve temporary denial of service on platforms where a 1-byte over-read can elicit process termination. This affects the database server and also libpq. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.5, 16.9, 15.13, 14.18, and 13.21 are affected.

    • Auf 17.5-1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  7. CVE-2025-1094

    Hoch · CVSS 8.1EPSS 90,03%Öffentlicher ExploitKorrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL quoting APIs miss neutralizing quoting syntax in text that fails encoding validation

    Improper neutralization of quoting syntax in PostgreSQL libpq functions PQescapeLiteral(), PQescapeIdentifier(), PQescapeString(), and PQescapeStringConn() allows a database input provider to achieve SQL injection in certain usage patterns. Specifically, SQL injection requires the application to use the function result to construct input to psql, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal. Similarly, improper neutralization of quoting syntax in PostgreSQL command line utility programs allows a source of command line arguments to achieve SQL injection when client_encoding is BIG5 and server_encoding is one of EUC_TW or MULE_INTERNAL. Versions befo

    • Auf 17.3-1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  8. CVE-2024-10979

    Hoch · CVSS 8.8EPSS 4,39%Korrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL PL/Perl environment variable changes execute arbitrary code

    Incorrect control of environment variables in PostgreSQL PL/Perl allows an unprivileged database user to change sensitive process environment variables (e.g. PATH). That often suffices to enable arbitrary code execution, even if the attacker lacks a database server operating system user. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, and 12.21 are affected.

    • Auf 17.1-1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  9. CVE-2024-10978

    Mittel · CVSS 4.2EPSS 0,69%Korrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL SET ROLE, SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION reset to wrong user ID

    Incorrect privilege assignment in PostgreSQL allows a less-privileged application user to view or change different rows from those intended. An attack requires the application to use SET ROLE, SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION, or an equivalent feature. The problem arises when an application query uses parameters from the attacker or conveys query results to the attacker. If that query reacts to current_setting('role') or the current user ID, it may modify or return data as though the session had not used SET ROLE or SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION. The attacker does not control which incorrect user ID applies. Query text from less-privileged sources

    • Auf 17.1-1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  10. CVE-2024-10977

    Niedrig · CVSS 3.1EPSS 0,4%Korrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL libpq retains an error message from man-in-the-middle

    Client use of server error message in PostgreSQL allows a server not trusted under current SSL or GSS settings to furnish arbitrary non-NUL bytes to the libpq application. For example, a man-in-the-middle attacker could send a long error message that a human or screen-scraper user of psql mistakes for valid query results. This is probably not a concern for clients where the user interface unambiguously indicates the boundary between one error message and other text. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, and 12.21 are affected.

    • Auf 17.1-1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  11. CVE-2024-10976

    Mittel · CVSS 4.2EPSS 0,77%Korrektur verfügbar

    PostgreSQL row security below e.g. subqueries disregards user ID changes

    Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a reused query to view or change different rows from those intended. CVE-2023-2455 and CVE-2016-2193 fixed most interaction between row security and user ID changes. They missed cases where a subquery, WITH query, security invoker view, or SQL-language function references a table with a row-level security policy. This has the same consequences as the two earlier CVEs. That is to say, it leads to potentially incorrect policies being applied in cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This

    • Auf 17.1-1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert

Prüfen Sie Ihren Server

Gleichen Sie Ihren installierten Stack und seine Versionen mit den aktuellen Sicherheitsmeldungen ab.

Prüfen Sie Ihren Server →