p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Vulnerabilidades recientes

Vulnerabilidades de golang-google-grpc

Vulnerabilidades publicadas para golang-google-grpc en los últimos 30 días: 0. Incluidas en el catálogo KEV: 0.

Filtrar vulnerabilidades
Borrar filtros

Vulnerabilidades: 3

  1. CVE-2026-33186

    Crítica · CVSS 9.1EPSS 1,58%Sin corrección publicada

    gRPC-Go has an authorization bypass via missing leading slash in :path

    gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omitted the mandatory leading slash (e.g., `Service/Method` instead of `/Service/Method`). While the server successfully routed these requests to the correct handler, authorization interceptors (including the official `grpc/authz` package) evaluated the raw, non-canonical path string. Consequently, "deny" rules defined using canonical paths (starting with `/`) failed to

    Publicación Actualización
  2. CVE-2019-9515

    Alta · CVSS 7.5EPSS 87,29%Sin corrección publicada

    Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service

    Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.

    Publicación Actualización
  3. CVE-2019-9514

    Alta · CVSS 7.5EPSS 82,81%Sin corrección publicada

    Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service

    Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.

    Publicación Actualización

Comprueba tu servidor

Compara tu pila y las versiones instaladas con las bases actuales de vulnerabilidades.

Comprueba tu servidor →