p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Vulnérabilités récentes

Vulnérabilités de freeradius

Vulnérabilité publiée pour freeradius au cours des 30 derniers jours : 0. Dans le catalogue KEV : 0.

Filtrer les vulnérabilités
Effacer les filtres

Vulnérabilités : 41

  1. CVE-2024-3596

    Critique · CVSS 9EPSS 14,86%Correctif disponible

    RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.

    RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.

    • Mettez à jour vers 3.2.5+dfsg-1
    Publication Mise à jour
  2. CVE-2022-41860

    Élevée · CVSS 7.5EPSS 1,21%Correctif disponible

    CVE-2022-41860

    In freeradius, when an EAP-SIM supplicant sends an unknown SIM option, the server will try to look that option up in the internal dictionaries. This lookup will fail, but the SIM code will not check for that failure. Instead, it will dereference a NULL pointer, and cause the server to crash.

    • Mettez à jour vers 3.2.0+dfsg-1
    Publication Mise à jour
  3. CVE-2019-17185

    Élevée · CVSS 7.5EPSS 2,22%Correctif disponible

    CVE-2019-17185

    In FreeRADIUS 3.0.x before 3.0.20, the EAP-pwd module used a global OpenSSL BN_CTX instance to handle all handshakes. This mean multiple threads use the same BN_CTX instance concurrently, resulting in crashes when concurrent EAP-pwd handshakes are initiated. This can be abused by an adversary as a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack.

    • Mettez à jour vers 3.0.20+dfsg-1
    Publication Mise à jour
  4. CVE-2019-13456

    Moyenne · CVSS 6.5EPSS 1,8%Correctif disponible

    CVE-2019-13456

    In FreeRADIUS 3.0 through 3.0.19, on average 1 in every 2048 EAP-pwd handshakes fails because the password element cannot be found within 10 iterations of the hunting and pecking loop. This leaks information that an attacker can use to recover the password of any user. This information leakage is similar to the "Dragonblood" attack and CVE-2019-9494.

    • Mettez à jour vers 3.0.20+dfsg-1
    Publication Mise à jour
  5. CVE-2019-10143

    Moyenne · CVSS 6.4EPSS 0,34%Correctif disponible

    CVE-2019-10143

    It was discovered freeradius up to and including version 3.0.19 does not correctly configure logrotate, allowing a local attacker who already has control of the radiusd user to escalate his privileges to root, by tricking logrotate into writing a radiusd-writable file to a directory normally inaccessible by the radiusd user. NOTE: the upstream software maintainer has stated "there is simply no way for anyone to gain privileges through this alleged issue."

    • Mettez à jour vers 3.2.6+dfsg-3
    Publication Mise à jour
  6. CVE-2019-11235

    Critique · CVSS 9.8EPSS 3,57%Correctif disponible

    CVE-2019-11235

    FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 mishandles the "each participant verifies that the received scalar is within a range, and that the received group element is a valid point on the curve being used" protection mechanism, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9498 and CVE-2019-9499.

    • Mettez à jour vers 3.0.17+dfsg-1.1
    Publication Mise à jour
  7. CVE-2017-9148

    Critique · CVSS 9.8EPSS 3,91%Correctif disponible

    CVE-2017-9148

    The TLS session cache in FreeRADIUS 2.1.1 through 2.1.7, 3.0.x before 3.0.14, 3.1.x before 2017-02-04, and 4.0.x before 2017-02-04 fails to reliably prevent resumption of an unauthenticated session, which allows remote attackers (such as malicious 802.1X supplicants) to bypass authentication via PEAP or TTLS.

    • Mettez à jour vers 3.0.12+dfsg-5
    Publication Mise à jour

Vérifiez votre serveur

Comparez votre pile et les versions installées aux bases de vulnérabilités actuelles.

Vérifiez votre serveur →