CVE-2026-97764
django-allauth before 65.19.4 does not have the expected limits on failed login attempts because, in some common configurations, an attacker can leverage the handling of diacritics (e.g., accents) for a higher effective limit.
PatchFirst · Vulnérabilités récentes
Vulnérabilité publiée pour django-allauth au cours des 30 derniers jours : 0. Dans le catalogue KEV : 0.
Vulnérabilités : 4
django-allauth before 65.19.4 does not have the expected limits on failed login attempts because, in some common configurations, an attacker can leverage the handling of diacritics (e.g., accents) for a higher effective limit.
An open redirect vulnerability exists in django-allauth versions prior to 65.14.1 when SAML IdP initiated SSO is enabled (it is disabled by default), which may allow an attacker to redirect users to an arbitrary external website via a crafted URL.
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead.
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as is_active=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected.
Comparez votre pile et les versions installées aux bases de vulnérabilités actuelles.