p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Vulnérabilités récentes

Vulnérabilités de connman

Vulnérabilité publiée pour connman au cours des 30 derniers jours : 1. Dans le catalogue KEV : 0.

Filtrer les vulnérabilités
Effacer les filtres

Vulnérabilités : 11

  1. CVE-2026-115863

    Élevée · CVSS 7.6EPSS 0,3%Aucun correctif publié

    CVE-2026-115863

    ConnMan through 2.0 has a stack-based buffer overflow via a DHCPv6 Reply message. This occurs in get_domains in gdhcp/client.c. It copies a fixed NS_MAXDNAME (1025) bytes from a DHCPv6 DOMAIN_LIST (option 24) value into a 1026-byte stack buffer dns_name regardless of the actual option length, then walks DNS labels with an unbounded "c += jump + 1" loop. A crafted DHCPv6 REPLY with a DOMAIN_LIST option of >= 1025 non-zero bytes makes the label walk leave the buffer and read/write '.' past its end in attacker-chosen strides. An on-link attacker can trigger this without authentication via a forged Router Advertisement (O=1) and a forged DHCPv6 R

    Publication Mise à jour
  2. CVE-2025-32743

    Critique · CVSS 9EPSS 0,53%Aucun correctif publié

    CVE-2025-32743

    In ConnMan through 1.44, the lookup string in ns_resolv in dnsproxy.c can be NULL or an empty string when the TC (Truncated) bit is set in a DNS response. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code, because those lookup values lead to incorrect length calculations and incorrect memcpy operations.

    Publication Mise à jour
  3. CVE-2025-32366

    Moyenne · CVSS 4.8EPSS 0,41%Aucun correctif publié

    CVE-2025-32366

    In ConnMan through 1.44, parse_rr in dnsproxy.c has a memcpy length that depends on an RR RDLENGTH value, i.e., *rdlen=ntohs(rr->rdlen) and memcpy(response+offset,*end,*rdlen) without a check for whether the sum of *end and *rdlen exceeds max. Consequently, *rdlen may be larger than the amount of remaining packet data in the current state of parsing. Values of stack memory locations may be sent over the network in a response.

    Publication Mise à jour
  4. CVE-2024-3661

    Élevée · CVSS 7.6EPSS 4,06%Aucun correctif publié

    DHCP routing options can manipulate interface-based VPN traffic

    DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). VPN-based security solutions that rely on routes to redirect traffic can be forced to leak traffic over the physical interface. An attacker on the same local network can read, disrupt, or possibly modify network traffic that was expected to be protected by the VPN.

    Publication Mise à jour

Vérifiez votre serveur

Comparez votre pile et les versions installées aux bases de vulnérabilités actuelles.

Vérifiez votre serveur →