p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Aktuelle Sicherheitslücken

Sicherheitslücken in snapd

In den letzten 30 Tagen veröffentlichte Sicherheitslücken für snapd: 0. Davon im KEV-Katalog: 0.

Sicherheitslücken filtern
Filter zurücksetzen

Sicherheitslücken: 20

  1. CVE-2024-5300

    Mittel · CVSS 5.6EPSS 0,13%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    AppArmor Base Profile Misconfiguration in snapd Permits Confined Snaps Unauthorized Access to Hashed Passwords via systemd-userdbd

    An access control bypass and information disclosure vulnerability exists in the base AppArmor security profile configuration of Canonical snapd. The abstraction rules located in /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/nss-systemd (inherited via ) inadvertently permit strictly confined snap applications, which lack the privileged account-control interface, to interact directly with the io.systemd.Multiplexer and io.systemd.NameServiceSwitch UNIX domain sockets under /run/systemd/userdb/. On systems where the systemd-userdbd service is installed and operational, the service fails to distinguish between an unconfined root user on the host system and a rest

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  2. CVE-2026-46595

    Kritisch · CVSS 10EPSS 0,56%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Invoking VerifiedPublicKeyCallback permissions skip enforcement in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh

    Previously, CVE-2024-45337 fixed an authorization bypass for misused ssh server configurations; if any other type of callback is passed other than public key, then the source-address validation would be skipped.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  3. CVE-2026-39834

    Kritisch · CVSS 9.1EPSS 0,6%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Invoking infinite loop on large channel writes in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh

    When writing data larger than 4GB in a single Write call on an SSH channel, an integer overflow in the internal payload size calculation caused the write loop to spin indefinitely, sending empty packets without making progress. The size comparison now uses int64 to prevent truncation.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  4. CVE-2026-39831

    Kritisch · CVSS 9.1EPSS 0,48%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Invoking bypass of FIDO/U2F security keys physical interaction in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh

    The Verify() method for FIDO/U2F security key types ([email protected], [email protected]) did not check the User Presence flag. Signatures generated without physical touch were accepted, allowing unattended use of a hardware security key. To restore the previous behavior, return a "no-touch-required" extension in Permissions.Extensions from PublicKeyCallback.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  5. CVE-2026-39829

    Hoch · CVSS 7.5EPSS 0,47%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Invoking pathological RSA/DSA parameters may cause DoS in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh

    The RSA and DSA public key parsers did not enforce size limits on key parameters. A crafted public key with an excessively large modulus or DSA parameter could cause several minutes of CPU consumption during signature verification. This could be triggered by unauthenticated clients during public key authentication. RSA moduli are now limited to 8192 bits, and DSA parameters are validated per FIPS 186-2.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  6. CVE-2026-39830

    Kritisch · CVSS 9.1EPSS 0,68%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Invoking client can cause server deadlock on unexpected responses in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh

    A malicious SSH peer could send unsolicited global request responses to fill an internal buffer, blocking the connection's read loop. The blocked goroutine could not be released by calling Close(), resulting in a resource leak per connection. Unsolicited global responses are now discarded.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  7. CVE-2026-39827

    Mittel · CVSS 6.5EPSS 0,28%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Invoking memory leak when rejecting channels can lead to DoS in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh

    An authenticated SSH client that repeatedly opened channels which were rejected by the server caused unbounded memory growth, eventually crashing the server process and affecting all connected users. Rejected channels are now properly removed from the connection's internal state and released for garbage collection.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  8. CVE-2026-39835

    Mittel · CVSS 5.3EPSS 0,5%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Invoking server panic during CheckHostKey/Authenticate in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh

    SSH servers which use CertChecker as a public key callback without setting IsUserAuthority or IsHostAuthority could be caused to panic by a client presenting a certificate. CertChecker now returns an error instead of panicking when these callbacks are nil.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  9. CVE-2026-39828

    Mittel · CVSS 6.3EPSS 0,37%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Invoking bypass of certificate restrictions in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh

    When an SSH server authentication callback returned PartialSuccessError with non-nil Permissions, those permissions were silently discarded, potentially dropping certificate restrictions such as force-command after a second factor succeeded. Returning non-nil Permissions with PartialSuccessError now results in a connection error.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  10. CVE-2026-39832

    Kritisch · CVSS 9.1EPSS 0,68%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Invoking agent constraints dropped when forwarding keys in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/agent

    When adding a key to a remote agent constraint extensions such as [email protected] were not serialized in the request. Destination restrictions were silently stripped when forwarding keys, allowing unrestricted use of the key on the remote host. The client now serializes all constraint extensions. Additionally, the in-memory keyring returned by NewKeyring() now rejects keys with unsupported constraint extensions instead of silently ignoring them.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  11. CVE-2026-39833

    Kritisch · CVSS 9.1EPSS 0,47%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Invoking key constraints not enforced in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/agent

    The in-memory keyring returned by NewKeyring() silently accepted keys with the ConfirmBeforeUse constraint but never enforced it. The key would sign without any confirmation prompt, with no indication to the caller that the constraint was not in effect. NewKeyring() now returns an error when unsupported constraints are requested.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  12. CVE-2026-3888

    Hoch · CVSS 7.8EPSS 1,38%Öffentlicher ExploitKorrektur verfügbar

    Local Privilege Escalation in snapd

    Local privilege escalation in snapd on Linux allows local attackers to get root privilege by re-creating snap's private /tmp directory when systemd-tmpfiles is configured to automatically clean up this directory. This issue affects Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS, 22.04 LTS, and 24.04 LTS.

    • Auf 2.73+ubuntu25.10.1 aktualisieren
    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  13. CVE-2025-47914

    Mittel · CVSS 5.3EPSS 0,55%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    Malformed constraint may cause denial of service in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/agent

    SSH Agent servers do not validate the size of messages when processing new identity requests, which may cause the program to panic if the message is malformed due to an out of bounds read.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert
  14. CVE-2019-11840

    Mittel · CVSS 5.9EPSS 3,45%Keine Korrektur veröffentlicht

    CVE-2019-11840

    An issue was discovered in the supplementary Go cryptography library, golang.org/x/crypto, before v0.0.0-20190320223903-b7391e95e576. A flaw was found in the amd64 implementation of the golang.org/x/crypto/salsa20 and golang.org/x/crypto/salsa20/salsa packages. If more than 256 GiB of keystream is generated, or if the counter otherwise grows greater than 32 bits, the amd64 implementation will first generate incorrect output, and then cycle back to previously generated keystream. Repeated keystream bytes can lead to loss of confidentiality in encryption applications, or to predictability in CSPRNG applications.

    Veröffentlicht Aktualisiert

Prüfen Sie Ihren Server

Gleichen Sie Ihren installierten Stack und seine Versionen mit den aktuellen Sicherheitsmeldungen ab.

Prüfen Sie Ihren Server →