p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Latest vulnerabilities

connman vulnerabilities

Vulnerability published for connman in the last 30 days: 1. Listed in the KEV catalogue: 0.

Filter vulnerabilities
Clear filters

Vulnerabilities: 4

  1. CVE-2026-115863

    High · CVSS 7.6EPSS 0.3%No fix published

    CVE-2026-115863

    ConnMan through 2.0 has a stack-based buffer overflow via a DHCPv6 Reply message. This occurs in get_domains in gdhcp/client.c. It copies a fixed NS_MAXDNAME (1025) bytes from a DHCPv6 DOMAIN_LIST (option 24) value into a 1026-byte stack buffer dns_name regardless of the actual option length, then walks DNS labels with an unbounded "c += jump + 1" loop. A crafted DHCPv6 REPLY with a DOMAIN_LIST option of >= 1025 non-zero bytes makes the label walk leave the buffer and read/write '.' past its end in attacker-chosen strides. An on-link attacker can trigger this without authentication via a forged Router Advertisement (O=1) and a forged DHCPv6 R

    Published Updated
  2. CVE-2025-32743

    Critical · CVSS 9EPSS 0.53%No fix published

    CVE-2025-32743

    In ConnMan through 1.44, the lookup string in ns_resolv in dnsproxy.c can be NULL or an empty string when the TC (Truncated) bit is set in a DNS response. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code, because those lookup values lead to incorrect length calculations and incorrect memcpy operations.

    Published Updated
  3. CVE-2025-32366

    Medium · CVSS 4.8EPSS 0.4%No fix published

    CVE-2025-32366

    In ConnMan through 1.44, parse_rr in dnsproxy.c has a memcpy length that depends on an RR RDLENGTH value, i.e., *rdlen=ntohs(rr->rdlen) and memcpy(response+offset,*end,*rdlen) without a check for whether the sum of *end and *rdlen exceeds max. Consequently, *rdlen may be larger than the amount of remaining packet data in the current state of parsing. Values of stack memory locations may be sent over the network in a response.

    Published Updated
  4. CVE-2024-3661

    High · CVSS 7.6EPSS 4.06%No fix published

    DHCP routing options can manipulate interface-based VPN traffic

    DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). VPN-based security solutions that rely on routes to redirect traffic can be forced to leak traffic over the physical interface. An attacker on the same local network can read, disrupt, or possibly modify network traffic that was expected to be protected by the VPN.

    Published Updated

Check your server

Check your installed stack and versions against the current vulnerability feeds.

Check your server →