Medium · CVSS 4EPSS 0.19%Public exploitFix available
CVE-2026-39113
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in SQLite affected version source snapshots/builds containing Fossil check-in 8bdc0d485e3ad0c7a1e818da66f106951d496b05cbe61d12c2c448f2f24b6d5d (Git mirror 169f68ed88b34cb68f720191c64c058f2ccec508, 2026-03-11) and later snapshots/builds allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the ext/misc/sqlar.c, sqlarUncompressFunc(), sqlar_uncompress(), sqlite3_value_int64(), sqlite3_malloc(int), uncompress() components
An issue in SQLite before Fossil check-in 869a51ae84df allows a local attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Session Extension changeset concat/changegroup merge path
A NULL pointer dereference in the SQLite Session Extension in SQLite 3.53.1 and SQLite trunk builds before check-in e807d4e3798efd53 allows an attacker who can supply a malformed changeset blob to cause a denial of service. The issue occurs when sqlite3changeset_apply_v3() applies a corrupt changeset and reaches sqlite3_value_type() with a NULL sqlite3_value pointer.
SQLite before 3.53.2 Heap Buffer Overflow via FTS5 fts5ChunkIterate
SQLite before 3.53.2 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the FTS5 full-text search extension that allows attackers to cause a crash or execute arbitrary code by supplying a crafted database with malicious continuation page metadata specifying a szLeaf value smaller than 4. Attackers can trigger an integer underflow in fts5ChunkIterate() causing an inflated remaining byte count during FTS5 MATCH query processing, leading to a heap buffer overflow of attacker-controlled data in applications compiled with SQLITE_ENABLE_FTS5.
SQLite before 3.53.2 Memory Corruption in FTS5 Extension
SQLite before 3.53.2 contains memory corruption vulnerabilities in the FTS5 full-text search extension that allow attackers to cause process crashes, memory exhaustion, or arbitrary code execution by supplying a crafted database with malformed FTS5 page data. Attackers can trigger an out-of-bounds read in fts5LeafSeek() via an attacker-controlled loop bound and a heap buffer overflow write in fts5ChunkIterate() through a crafted continuation page causing an integer underflow, exploitable when an FTS5 MATCH query is executed against the malicious database.
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2025-29088. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2025-29088. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2025-29088 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
An integer overflow exists in the FTS5 https://sqlite.org/fts5.html extension. It occurs when the size of an array of tombstone pointers is calculated and truncated into a 32-bit integer. A pointer to partially controlled data can then be written out of bounds.
High · CVSS 7.2EPSS 73.45%Public exploitFix available
Integer Truncation on SQLite
There exists a vulnerability in SQLite versions before 3.50.2 where the number of aggregate terms could exceed the number of columns available. This could lead to a memory corruption issue. We recommend upgrading to version 3.50.2 or above.
An integer overflow can be triggered in SQLite’s `concat_ws()` function. The resulting, truncated integer is then used to allocate a buffer. When SQLite then writes the resulting string to the buffer, it uses the original, untruncated size and thus a wild Heap Buffer overflow of size ~4GB can be triggered. This can result in arbitrary code execution.
In SQLite 3.49.0 before 3.49.1, certain argument values to sqlite3_db_config (in the C-language API) can cause a denial of service (application crash). An sz*nBig multiplication is not cast to a 64-bit integer, and consequently some memory allocations may be incorrect.
In SQLite 3.44.0 through 3.49.0 before 3.49.1, the concat_ws() SQL function can cause memory to be written beyond the end of a malloc-allocated buffer. If the separator argument is attacker-controlled and has a large string (e.g., 2MB or more), an integer overflow occurs in calculating the size of the result buffer, and thus malloc may not allocate enough memory.