p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Latest vulnerabilities

pyjwt vulnerabilities

Vulnerability published for pyjwt in the last 30 days: 1. Listed in the KEV catalogue: 0.

Filter vulnerabilities
Clear filters

Vulnerabilities: 11

  1. CVE-2026-103001

    Medium · CVSS 6.5EPSS 0.26%Public exploitNo fix published

    PyJWT.decode() reintroduces options-dict mutation, enabling silent claim-verification bypass on dict reuse

    PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.11.0 through 2.13.0, PyJWT's PyJWT._merge_options() method can modify a caller-supplied mutable options mapping when verify_signature is false. If an application reuses that same mapping for a later decode() or decode_complete() call and changes verify_signature to true, the mapping can retain false values for expiration, not-before, issued-at, audience, issuer, subject, and JWT ID checks. A signed token with invalid registered claims can then be accepted without disabling signature verification, but applications that create a fresh options mapping for each call are not affe

    Published Updated
  2. CVE-2026-102265

    Medium · CVSS 5.3EPSS 0.34%No fix published

    PyJWT: Uncaught RecursionError in jwt.decode() on deeply nested token header

    PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, PyJWS._load in jwt/api_jws.py is affected because parser catches ValueError but not RecursionError. This occurs when a deeply nested token header reaches json.loads. As a result, RecursionError escapes the documented PyJWT error hierarchy. Consequently, an unauthenticated malformed token can cause a request-level failure and HTTP 500. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.

    Published Updated
  3. CVE-2026-102273

    High · CVSS 7.4EPSS 0.18%Fix available

    PyJWT accepts public JWK containers as HMAC secrets

    PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, PyJWT HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key is affected because HMAC key guard only recognizes top-level public JWK forms and misses container representations. This occurs when an application allows HMAC and asymmetric algorithms and passes a public JWK container as the raw key. As a result, public asymmetric key material is accepted as the HMAC secret. Consequently, an attacker who knows the public key can forge a token with arbitrary authenticated claims. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.

    • Update to 1.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm3
    Published Updated
  4. CVE-2026-102272

    High · CVSS 7.4EPSS 0.22%Fix available

    PyJWT BOM Bypass

    PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because raw-JWK detector does not normalize accepted Unicode byte-order marks before checking for JSON. This occurs when a public JWK is prefixed with a UTF-8 BOM and used in a mixed-algorithm verification path. As a result, public JWK bypasses asymmetric-key detection and becomes the HMAC secret. Consequently, an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated tokens. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.

    • Update to 1.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm3
    Published Updated
  5. CVE-2026-102271

    High · CVSS 7.4EPSS 0.21%Fix available

    PyJWT: Public keys in DER form are accepted as HMAC secrets, bypassing the CVE-2022-29217 guard

    PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.4.0 until 2.14.0, PyJWT HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key is affected because asymmetric-key guard relies on textual markers that are absent from DER encoding. This occurs when an application mixes HMAC and asymmetric algorithms and supplies a DER public key as the shared verification key. As a result, PyJWT uses public DER bytes as an HMAC secret. Consequently, an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.

    • Update to 1.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm3
    Published Updated
  6. CVE-2026-102270

    Medium · CVSS 4.4EPSS 0.25%No fix published

    PyJWT: ReDoS vulnerability when calling the `is_pem_format` function.

    PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT is_pem_format is affected because lazy PEM regular expression backtracks extensively. This occurs when a certificate-like input contains repeated BEGIN markers without a matching END marker. As a result, is_pem_format performs unbounded backtracking while searching for a PEM end marker. Consequently, an attacker can cause intensive CPU consumption. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.

    Published Updated
  7. CVE-2026-102269

    Medium · CVSS 4.8EPSS 0.22%No fix published

    PyJWT: Non-canonical signature segments enable raw-token revocation bypass

    PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT signature segment is affected because signature segment decoding accepts characters outside the canonical Base64URL representation. This occurs when non-Base64URL characters are appended to a valid compact JWS signature segment. As a result, base64url_decode produces the same signature bytes for different serialized segments. Consequently, raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.

    Published Updated
  8. CVE-2026-102268

    Critical · CVSS 9.1EPSS 0.24%Public exploitFix available

    PyJWT: Asymmetric-PEM detection bypass: whitespace/line-ending-mutated public keys skip the HS/asymmetric confusion guard

    PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, is_pem_format in jwt/utils.py is affected because is_pem_format does not recognize every PEM representation accepted by the cryptography loader. This occurs when an application mixes HMAC and asymmetric algorithms and supplies a mutated public-key PEM as raw key bytes. As a result, HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key treats the unrecognized asymmetric public key as an HMAC secret. Consequently, an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.

    • Update to 1.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm3
    Published Updated
  9. CVE-2026-101918

    Medium · CVSS 5.3EPSS 0.41%Fix available

    PyJWT: Unauthenticated RecursionError DoS in pre-verification payload parse (PyJWKClient.get_signing_key_from_jwt / verify_signature=False)

    PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.0.0a1 until 2.15.0, PyJWT PyJWKClient.get_signing_key_from_jwt is affected because payload parser catches ValueError but not RecursionError. This occurs when an attacker-controlled recursively nested payload reaches json.loads. As a result, documented PyJWT exception handling does not contain the failure. Consequently, an unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response. The advisory-defined affected implementation also includes jwt/api_jwt.py, verify_signature=False. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.

    • Update to 1.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm4
    Published Updated
  10. CVE-2026-48526

    High · CVSS 7.4EPSS 0.43%Fix available

    PyJWT: Public-key JWK accepted as HMAC secret enables forged HS256 tokens when mixed families are allowed

    PyJWT is a JSON Web Token implementation in Python. Prior to 2.13.0, when the verifier is decoding JSON Web Tokens, while supporting both asymmetric and HMAC algorithms, the library does not validate use of JSON Web Keys in HMAC algorithm, allowing attacker to use the issuer public key as the secret key for HMAC algorithm. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.13.0.

    • Update to 1.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm2
    Published Updated
  11. CVE-2026-32597

    High · CVSS 7.5EPSS 0.27%Fix available

    PyJWT accepts unknown `crit` header extensions (RFC 7515 §4.1.11 MUST violation)

    PyJWT is a JSON Web Token implementation in Python. Prior to 2.12.0, PyJWT does not validate the crit (Critical) Header Parameter defined in RFC 7515 §4.1.11. When a JWS token contains a crit array listing extensions that PyJWT does not understand, the library accepts the token instead of rejecting it. This violates the MUST requirement in the RFC. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.12.0.

    • Update to 1.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm1
    Published Updated

Check your server

Check your installed stack and versions against the current vulnerability feeds.

Check your server →